In response to Mr Williams’ quixotic second attempt to coax the former speaker of the House into acknowledging that insistently calling Barack Obama “the food-stamp president” smacks of racial politics, Mr Gingrich rejoined: “First of all, Juan, more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than any president in history.” This incredibly misleading claim sent the crowd into an ecstasy of delight. “I know among the politically correct you’re not supposed to use facts that are uncomfortable”, Mr Gingrich added to the warm applause of those in attendance brave enough to face the truth.
Of course, Barack Obama has put no one on food stamps. Population growth together with the most severe recession since the advent of the modern American welfare state, which was in full swing when Mr Obama came into office, conspired to make a record number eligible for government food assistance. The Obama administration has moved to expand eligibility for the SNAP programme, but the initiative has not come to fruition. That there is a safety net, and that it succeeds in keeping millions of Americans from the misery and humiliation of hunger, may be an uncomfortable fact for Mr Gingrich, but not for Mr Obama or for any of those among us who do not lament this humane achievement.
A thought experiment: On Twin Earth, does anyone call President John McCain the “food-stamp president”? Is it “politically incorrect” there to call him that? Or is it just so tactically weird to pin that label on a white Republican who inherited a huge recession that the idea simply never occurred to anyone? If, back in our world, it’s not “politically correct” and not tactically weird to pin that label on a black Democrat who inherited a huge recession, then why not?
Emphasis added.
